H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 07/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 23cm hemosplit d/l catheter kit with the following components were received: one 23cm hemosplit d/l catheter, one tunneler with a loaded protective sheath, one vessel dilator, two luer caps, one j-tip guidewire in a guidewire hoop, one 8fr dilator, one 12fr dilator, one used adhesive dressing and two peeled apart sheath shafts.In addition to the returned sample analysis, two electronic photos and one electronic image were provided for review.Gross visual, tactile and microscopic visual evaluations were performed.Both peeled apart sheath shafts reflected "bard" on their respective t-handle, so both were mismatched.Bends and twists were noted throughout both peeled apart sheath shafts.The catheter was gently stretched, and normal elasticity was observed throughout.No kinks were noted throughout.Therefore the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported deformation issue.Furthermore the image review shows the catheter could not be passed successfully and became stuck at some point within the sheath.Therefore the investigation is confirmed for the reported reported failure to advance and physical resistance issue.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.(expiry date: 07/2024) section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|