Model Number FG0094 |
Device Problems
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problem
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
|
Event Date 09/28/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Who: the doctors office informed ulab of a patient with a possible allergic reaction.What: patient had a possible allergic reaction to aligner # 4 with his ulab treatment.When: (b)(6) 2023.Where: this issue occurred while the patient was wearing aligner #4 (personal lifestyle) after being fit in the doctor's office.Why: no rma issued.As of 11/28/23, there has been no additional information regarding the patient's allergy history, etc, provided by the doctor.It is undetermined as to why the patient was reactive to the stage 4 aligners, but not the previous 1-3 stage aligners, as they are all made of the same zendura material and processed together through the manufacturing process.As we don't have any information on the patient's allergy history, this reaction may be due to other external factors/common allergens that were introduced coincidentally at same time as the placement of the stage 4 aligners, such as pollens, dustmites, pet allergens, biologic products, insect venoms, or other orthodontic treatment materials including glues/adhesives, rubber bands, latex, or attachment materials used in the treatment planning.It is undetermined if the zendura flx material was the cause of the allergic reaction.Conclusion: patient to try the stage 5-10 aligners in reva material (after the reaction clears-up), as another external factor may be causing the allergic reaction/issue.Per sop0014, mandatory medical device reporting, section 8 (australia), this allergic reaction incident is not significant enough for the australia reportability criteria and will not be reported as an adverse incident to the ulab australian sponsor (emergo) or the relevant australian regulatory authority, per the reporting requirement/timelines and australian medical devices guidelines (argmd), chapter 22 post-market vigilance and monitoring requirements.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Who: the doctors office informed ulab of a patient with a possible allergic reaction.What: patient had a possible allergic reaction to aligner # 4 with his ulab treatment.When: (b)(6) 2023.Where: this issue occurred while the patient was wearing aligner #4 (personal lifestyle) after being fit in the doctor's office.Why: no rma issued.As of 11/28/23, there has been no additional information regarding the patient's allergy history, etc, provided by the doctor.It is undetermined as to why the patient was reactive to the stage 4 aligners, but not the previous 1-3 stage aligners, as they are all made of the same zendura material and processed together through the manufacturing process.As we don't have any information on the patient's allergy history, this reaction may be due to other external factors/common allergens that were introduced coincidentally at same time as the placement of the stage 4 aligners, such as pollens, dustmites, pet allergens, biologic products, insect venoms, or other orthodontic treatment materials including glues/adhesives, rubber bands, latex, or attachment materials used in the treatment planning.It is undetermined if the zendura flx material was the cause of the allergic reaction.Conclusion: patient to try the stage 5-10 aligners in reva material (after the reaction clears-up), as another external factor may be causing the allergic reaction/issue.Per sop0014, mandatory medical device reporting, section 8 (australia), this allergic reaction incident is not significant enough for the australia reportability criteria and will not be reported as an adverse incident to the ulab australian sponsor (emergo) or the relevant australian regulatory authority, per the reporting requirement/timelines and australian medical devices guidelines (argmd), chapter 22 post-market vigilance and monitoring requirements.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|