• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ULAB SYSTEMS ULAB SYSTEMS USMILE ALIGNER; CLEAR ALIGNER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ULAB SYSTEMS ULAB SYSTEMS USMILE ALIGNER; CLEAR ALIGNER Back to Search Results
Model Number FG0094
Device Problems Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
Event Date 09/28/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Who: the doctors office informed ulab of a patient with a possible allergic reaction.What: patient had a possible allergic reaction to aligner # 4 with his ulab treatment.When: (b)(6) 2023.Where: this issue occurred while the patient was wearing aligner #4 (personal lifestyle) after being fit in the doctor's office.Why: no rma issued.As of 11/28/23, there has been no additional information regarding the patient's allergy history, etc, provided by the doctor.It is undetermined as to why the patient was reactive to the stage 4 aligners, but not the previous 1-3 stage aligners, as they are all made of the same zendura material and processed together through the manufacturing process.As we don't have any information on the patient's allergy history, this reaction may be due to other external factors/common allergens that were introduced coincidentally at same time as the placement of the stage 4 aligners, such as pollens, dustmites, pet allergens, biologic products, insect venoms, or other orthodontic treatment materials including glues/adhesives, rubber bands, latex, or attachment materials used in the treatment planning.It is undetermined if the zendura flx material was the cause of the allergic reaction.Conclusion: patient to try the stage 5-10 aligners in reva material (after the reaction clears-up), as another external factor may be causing the allergic reaction/issue.Per sop0014, mandatory medical device reporting, section 8 (australia), this allergic reaction incident is not significant enough for the australia reportability criteria and will not be reported as an adverse incident to the ulab australian sponsor (emergo) or the relevant australian regulatory authority, per the reporting requirement/timelines and australian medical devices guidelines (argmd), chapter 22 post-market vigilance and monitoring requirements.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Who: the doctors office informed ulab of a patient with a possible allergic reaction.What: patient had a possible allergic reaction to aligner # 4 with his ulab treatment.When: (b)(6) 2023.Where: this issue occurred while the patient was wearing aligner #4 (personal lifestyle) after being fit in the doctor's office.Why: no rma issued.As of 11/28/23, there has been no additional information regarding the patient's allergy history, etc, provided by the doctor.It is undetermined as to why the patient was reactive to the stage 4 aligners, but not the previous 1-3 stage aligners, as they are all made of the same zendura material and processed together through the manufacturing process.As we don't have any information on the patient's allergy history, this reaction may be due to other external factors/common allergens that were introduced coincidentally at same time as the placement of the stage 4 aligners, such as pollens, dustmites, pet allergens, biologic products, insect venoms, or other orthodontic treatment materials including glues/adhesives, rubber bands, latex, or attachment materials used in the treatment planning.It is undetermined if the zendura flx material was the cause of the allergic reaction.Conclusion: patient to try the stage 5-10 aligners in reva material (after the reaction clears-up), as another external factor may be causing the allergic reaction/issue.Per sop0014, mandatory medical device reporting, section 8 (australia), this allergic reaction incident is not significant enough for the australia reportability criteria and will not be reported as an adverse incident to the ulab australian sponsor (emergo) or the relevant australian regulatory authority, per the reporting requirement/timelines and australian medical devices guidelines (argmd), chapter 22 post-market vigilance and monitoring requirements.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULAB SYSTEMS USMILE ALIGNER
Type of Device
CLEAR ALIGNER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ULAB SYSTEMS
7005 appling farms parkway
memphis TN 38133
Manufacturer (Section G)
ULAB SYSTEMS
7005 appling farms parkway
memphis TN 38133
Manufacturer Contact
shawn forsythe
7005 appling farms parkway
memphis, TN 38133
8669008522
MDR Report Key18220385
MDR Text Key329157094
Report Number3017155477-2023-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXC
UDI-Device Identifier00860002380094
UDI-Public00860002380094
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNZ
PMA/PMN Number
K192596N/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFG0094
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberJRN10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/28/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FG0094, ULAB SYSTEMS USMILE DENTAL ALIGNER KIT
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-