The reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation.However an image evaluation was performed and found that three intra-operative images were provided and confirm the passer breakage.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states that all documents and images provided as of this date have been reviewed and considered and unless noted do not contribute to the clinical/medical investigation.Based on the sales representative report, a user error cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to the reported breakage of the jaw of the firstpass mini suture.The firstpass mini suture passer is manufactured and intended as an externally communicating device that should have limited tissue/bone contact.The broken jaw was presumed retained as it was not noted it was removed, or if it was left secure.Therefore, the potential for micro-motion and/or migration and local irritation/discomfort cannot be ruled out as potentially impacting the patient.The root cause of the reported event could not be determined since findings cannot lead to a clear cause of the reported event.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include (1) excessive force (2) tissue thickness (3) damage or debris on the device tip between passes.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|