On (b)(6) a 2013 pacemaker was replaced with the alizea (b)(6).On november 6th 2023, the patient was reoperated for possible capture failure in the rv lead, but the (b)(6) indicated that there was a failure in the connection of the right ventricular lead and that the connection screw did not ratchet.The pacemaker has been replaced.
|
The conclusions are as follows: the electrical characteristics of the returned device conformed to established specifications.Upon reception of the device, pacing pulses were generated appropriately by the device.The visual inspection did not reveal any abnormality.The analysis confirms that the connection system of the subject pacemaker functioned as specified using a duplicate torque-limiting screwdriver.Atrial and ventricular setscrews were found completely unscrewed.The ventricular one is rotated 180°.The user has probably completely unscrewed the setscrews then removed the screwdriver.Afterwards, he was not able to reposition the setscrews.In addition, no obvious tightening marks on the atrial and the ventricular setscrew tips were noted.Those observations indicate an incorrect/ incomplete lead connection to the pacemaker at both channels and therefore could explain the capture failure described in the complaint, as well as, the fact that the physician did not hear the ratchet¿s sound.- based on the available data, no issue is suspected on the subject pacemaker.For more details, please refer to the attached analysis report.
|
On (b)(6) 2013 pacemaker was replaced with the alizea ((b)(6)).On (b)(6) 2023, the patient was reoperated for possible capture failure in the rv lead, but the physician indicated that there was a failure in the connection of the right ventricular lead and that the connection screw did not ratchet.The pacemaker has been replaced.
|