• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK SUPERA
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Stenosis (2263); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 01/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot number was not provided.The reported patient effects of occlusion and stenosis are listed in the supera peripherial stent system instructions for use as potential adverse effects of peripheral percutaneous intervention.A conclusive cause for the reported obstruction/occlusion and stenosis, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The treatment(s) appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.Dates estimated the udi is unknown due to the part/lot number was not provided.The additional patient deaths reported in the article are captured under a separate medwatch report.Literature attachment: article title - comparison of interwoven nitinol and drug-eluting stents for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery diseasena.
 
Event Description
The aim of this study was to compare the performance of interwoven nitinol stents (supera self-expanding stents) versus non-abbott drug-eluting stents (des) in the endovascular revascularization of the patient with femoropopliteal arterial lesions.Thirty five patient's were treated with supera stents versus twenty seven with des for the duration of two years.Follow ups were conducted at the 2 month and 12 month after the initial procedure.Although there were some complications (in-stent restenosis, stent occlusion, death, target lesion revascularization) over the duration of the study the results did not provide any evidence to favor the use of one stent over the other.Specific patient information is documented as unknown.Details are listed in the attached article, titled "comparison of interwoven nitinol and drug-eluting stents for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease" no additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERA
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 2024168
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key18278937
MDR Text Key329886989
Report Number2024168-2023-13553
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
P120020
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/06/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK SUPERA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-