• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9610TF26U
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Failure to Align (2522)
Patient Problem Unspecified Vascular Problem (4441)
Event Date 11/08/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by an edwards lifesciences affiliate in france, regarding a 26 sapien 3 ultra in aortic position by transfemoral approach.During the procedure while performing valve alignment, the 26mm commander delivery system catheter was pulled and the fine adjustment wheel was rotated at the same time.This caused to the wheel to be over rotated and the delivery system balloon was below the valve, near the pusher.When withdrawing the commander delivery system and valve there was a femoral complication.A cutdown was performed to retrieve the devices from the patient.A second system was prepared, and the patient successfully received a 26mm sapien 3 ultra valve implanted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is underway.H3 other text : not returned.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Imagery was provided for review by the site and revealed the following: failed attempt to withdraw the dislodged thv by pulling partially inflated balloon through dislodged thv.Guidewire appears curved, indicating non-coaxial withdrawal.Cutdown performed to remove dislodged thv from patient.The reported events were confirmed through review of the provided imagery.In this case, there was no allegation of device malfunction contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint.A review of the ifu and training manuals revealed no deficiencies.Per event description, while performing valve alignment, the catheter was pulled and the fine adjustment wheel was rotated at the same time, which led into wheel was over rotated and the balloon was below the valve and near the pusher.When withdrawing the commander delivery system and valve there was a femoral complication and it was needed to perform a cutdown to retrieve the devices from the patient.Procedural training manual provides indication on how to perform valve alignment.It also states warning: do not position the thv past the distal valve alignment marker.This will prevent proper thv deployment.As such, it is likely that the crimped thv was over aligned, potentially during fine adjustment of the valve onto the inflation balloon.Over alignment of the thv can potentially cause the valve being positioned too distal on the inflation balloon.On the other hand, the over aligned thv appeared to have dislodged off the balloon during withdrawal, potentially due to the interaction between vasculature and crimped valve struts compounded with a non-coaxial withdrawal shown in imagery provided, which likely contributed on causing the reported vascular complication.Available information suggests that use error (over-rotation of fine adjust) may have contributed to the valve alignment difficulties, while procedural factors (crimped valve interaction with vasculature, non-coaxial withdrawal) may have contributed with the thv dislodged off balloon event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506384
MDR Report Key18293390
MDR Text Key330065252
Report Number2015691-2023-18232
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/08/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9610TF26U
Device Lot Number65174884
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/29/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-