• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
During preventative maintenance (pm) performed at zoll, the autopulse platform (sn (b)(6)) passed the initial functional test without fault or error, but it failed the load cell characterization test.The root cause of the noted issue was the malfunctioning load cell #2, likely attributed to failed component(s) or mishandling, such as a drop.The failed load cell was replaced to remedy the fault.Unrelated to the noted failure, the drivetrain motor brake gap was found to be out of the specification (too narrow).This did not render the platform non-functional.The brake gap was adjusted within the specification to resolve the issue.During further inspection, it was noticed that the screws on the drivetrain motor brake were loose, which contributed to intermittent occurrences of several user advisory (ua) 17 (max motor on-time exceeded during active operation) that were recorded in the archive data.The screws were tightened to specification during the preventative maintenance service actions.Visual inspection of the autopulse platform did not show physical damage.Following service, another brake gap inspection was performed and verified the brake gap was within the specification.Another load cell characterization test was performed and confirmed that both cell modules were functioning within the specification.The autopulse platform was subjected to a run-in test using the 95% large resuscitation test fixture (lrtf) with known good test batteries until discharged without fault or error.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint, and one similar complaint was found for the autopulse platform with serial number (b)(6).Ccr 45095 was reported for ua07 (failed load cell characterization test) on 10 may 2019, and load cell #2 was replaced to remedy the fault.
 
Event Description
During preventative maintenance (pm), the autopulse platform (sn (b)(6)) failed the load cell characterization test.No patient involvement.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
kim thoa nguyen
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose, CA 95131
4084192922
MDR Report Key18297750
MDR Text Key330146983
Report Number3010617000-2023-01058
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/08/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0740-16
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/16/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/21/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/28/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-