• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Visual Prompts will not Clear (2281)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 11/15/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During the patient call, the autopulse platform (b)(6) stopped compression and displayed a user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large).No further information was provided.The patient's status information was requested, but the customer did not provide a response.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer's complaint that the autopulse platform (b)(6) stopped compression and displayed a user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) message was confirmed during the functional testing and the archive data review.The root cause of the ua07 was due to a failed load cell.The cracked enclosure and a load cell failure were likely attributed to mishandling, such as a drop, or the age of the platform.The autopulse platform was manufactured in 2010 and is over 13 years old, well past the expected serviceable life of five years.Unrelated to the reported complaint, a crack across the screw well area of the front enclosure handle, a large hole and crack on the load plate cover, a bent battery lock, and a frayed head restraint were noted upon visual inspection.The observed physical damages appear to be the characteristics of the harsh impact caused by user mishandling, such as a drop.The damaged parts were replaced to address the observed physical damages.The archive data indicated several ua07 on and around the reported event date, confirming the reported complaint.The autopulse platform failed initial functional testing due to a ua07 error message, confirming the reported complaint.The load cell characterization check revealed a failed load cell, which was replaced to address the reported ua07 error.Following service, the autopulse platform passed the run-in and final tests without fault or error.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint, and no similar complaint was reported for the autopulse platform with (b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
kim thoa nguyen
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose, CA 95131
4084192922
MDR Report Key18298309
MDR Text Key330140271
Report Number3010617000-2023-01033
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
UDI-Device Identifier00849111000512
UDI-Public00849111000512
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/09/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0730-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/30/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/02/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-