• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR TRIPOLAR 90 SUCTION ELECT; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR TRIPOLAR 90 SUCTION ELECT; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 225028
Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/20/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported by the sales rep in switzerland that during an unspecified surgical procedure on (b)(6) 2023, the vapr tripolar 90 suction elect device suction stopped working immediately after about ten minutes of the operation.It was reported that cleaning of the tip did not help and the suction of the stryker neptune still worked.It was reported that with a new electrode it worked again normally.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.Udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary the vapr tripolar 90 suction elect was returned to manufacturer for evaluation.The manufacturer conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received by customer.The visual inspection and functional test of the device were performed, as a result; the device was received only with its outer box, the tip was found in good condition.Procedural debris can be seen in suction holes.The handle assembly as well as the cable and plugs were found good, some small indents on cable, no damage to insulation.Procedural debris in suction tube, indent on suction tube.The device passed the electrical checks.The device did not pass the flow rate test before and after activation, ablation and coagulation function worked as intended.A dhr review has been performed for the complaint device lot number u2307117.No issues (ncrs or deviations) with the manufacturing process have been identified which could attribute to the complaint in question.From our investigation we were able to confirm the customer report that the electrode suction would not work with the returned complaint device.The device was found to fail flow specifications both before and after activation due to a build-up of tissue debris in the distal end of the electrode which could not be removed during the investigation.The indent observed on the suction tube is cosmetic only and has no impact on the performance of the device as the tube was still fully open.The investigation shows the blockage experienced by the end user is confirmed and can be attributed procedural tissue debris.No manufacturing defect was found with the returned device.The product ifu cautions not to allow the electrode to become covered in tissue debris.If this occurs, use a new electrode.The product ifu warns electrodes will wear from normal use, dependent on factors such as length of use, high tissue removal rate, prolonged use against bony surfaces, prolonged use in saline, high power settings, and use with minimal suction or fluid management.Periodically assess electrode tip for wear and proper operation.Replace the electrode if excessive wear is noted.The suction failure mode has been reviewed against the systems risk assessment document 892007, the highest identified risk within 892007 for failure modes that are equivalent to the complaint failure mode is loss or deterioration of function - reduced/blocked irrigant flow.Risk matrix line 1000 applies.Resulting in reduced visibility & increased procedure time - patient under anaesthetic extended period.The severity risk category is 'minor'- results in temporary injury or impairment not requiring professional medical attention.For this scenario a pre mitigation risk of grid 10 and a post mitigation risk of grid 10 are stated, which is 'minor' and 'frequent' and rated as low as reasonably achievable (alra).Based on a review of the investigation findings and risk documentation no correction action has been implemented.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VAPR TRIPOLAR 90 SUCTION ELECT
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 
3035526892
MDR Report Key18301353
MDR Text Key330171257
Report Number1221934-2023-04426
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705023103
UDI-Public10886705023103
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K143475
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number225028
Device Lot NumberU2307117
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/21/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/11/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/03/2024
02/13/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/09/2024
02/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/31/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-