Catalog Number S-60-150-120-P6 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/20/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in left superficial femoral artery.(sfa).A supera stent was implanted at the target lesion without issue.Then a 6.0x150mm supera stent was advanced distal of the previously implanted stent and the stent was implanted.When retracting the delivery system to be removed, resistance was noted with the thumbslide, and while pulling back the delivery system a break occurred.Under fluoroscopy, the distal end of the delivery system (near the nose cone) was observed to be separated; however, remained on the guide wire.A guide catheter was used to entrap the separated portion and remove it from the patient.Both supera remained implanted with no issues.There was no adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported tip separation was able to be confirmed.The reported mechanical jam was unable to be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The reported difficult to remove was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.As there was no damage noted to the device during the inspection prior to use, the investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that during removal interaction with the anatomy and/or the previously implanted supera stent resulted in the reported mechanical jam (resistance was noted with the thumbslide) and the reported difficult to remove.Interaction/manipulation of the compromised device ultimately resulted in the reported tip separation/noted inner member and tip jacket separations.The treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure as reportedly a guide catheter was used to entrap the separated portion and remove the separation from the patient.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|