The responsible dräger service engineer could confirm the reported issue during on-site checking and the entire motor assembly was replaced, consequently.Also the evaluation of the log file confirms an issue with the ventilator motor on the date of event.The log entries demonstrate that the supervisor function of the software forced a shutdown of automatic ventilation after detecting a stalled motor.This is a safety measure to prevent from mechanical damages to the ventilator unit.The user is alerted to the shutdown of automatic ventilation by a corresponding alarm; manual ventilation remains possible and monitoring is still functional.The motor was provided for investigation and was examined and tested in the laboratory whereby the reported failure could not be reproduced.Maybe a sporadic failure was present during the event which did not arise again during testing.As the symptom was confirmed during on-site inspection/ log analysis and was solved by replacement of the motor it can be concluded that the motor was root cause for the reported ventilator failure.It can be summarized that the device behaved as specified upon the detected deviation; no patient consequences have been reported.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|