• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GIF-Q260J
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Multiple Organ Failure (3261); Cancer (3262); Liver Failure (4492)
Event Date 04/26/2023
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "clinical outcomes of clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in treating gastric varices with a gastrorenal shunt".Background and study aims: the optimal treatment for gastric varices (gvs) is a topic that remains definite for this study.This study compared the clinical outcomes of clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (clip-eci) to conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (con-eci) for the treatment of gvs with a gastrorenal shunt.Patients and methods: data were collected retrospectively in five medical centers from 2015 to 2020.The patients were treated with con-eci (n = 126) or clip-eci (n = 148).Clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes were compared.Patients were followed until death, liver transplantation or 6 months after the treatment.The primary outcome was rebleeding, and the secondary outcome was survival.Results: there were no significant differences in age, sex, etiology, shunt diameter and child-pugh classification between the two groups.Fewer gvs obliteration sessions were required in the clip-eci group than in the con-eci group (p = 0.015).The cumulative 6-month rebleeding-free rates were 88.6% in the clip-eci group and 73.7% in the con-eci group (p = 0.002).The cumulative 6-month survival rates were 97.1% in the clip-eci group and 94.8% in the con-eci group (p = 0.378).Conclusions: compared with con-eci, clip-eci appears more effective for the treatment of gvs with a gastrorenal shunt, which required less sessions and achieved a higher 6-month rebleeding-free rate.Type of adverse events/number of patients: event1: complication (45 cases) (includes the following events) - ectopic embolism (2 cases) - fever (34 cases) - abdominal pain (3 cases) - nausea (2 cases) - chest pain (2 cases) - epigastric discomfort (1 case) - suspected anaphylaxis (1 case).Event2: rebleeding (46 cases) (causes are as follows) - varices (14 cases) - postinjection ulcers (19 cases) - portal hypertensive gastropathy (4 cases) - unknown (9 cases).Event3: death (10 cases) (causes are as follows) - rebleeding (4 cases) - hepatic failure (2 cases) - hepatic cancer (2 cases) - multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (1 cases) - acute pulmonary embolism (1 cases).This article requires 2 reports: the related patient identifiers are as follows: (b)(6) gif-q260j evis lucera gastrointestinal videoscope (model gif-q260j) - captures event 1 and event 2 (b)(6) gif-q260j evis lucera gastrointestinal videoscope (model gif-q260j) - captures event 3 (death).This medwatch is for patient identifier (b)(6) (event 3 death).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
E1 establishment name: (b)(6) hospital.The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The literature article is attached for additional information.Doi.Org/10.1080/00365521.2023.2204388 provided for additional information.The investigation is ongoing, and a supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse events cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS LUCERA GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18315648
MDR Text Key330326126
Report Number9610595-2023-19422
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/10/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/12/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGIF-Q260J
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
INJECTION NEEDLES, METAL CLIPS; NEEDLE CATHETER, TISSUE ADHESIVES
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-