• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number X85L
Device Problem Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 10/15/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On december 12, 2023, nakanishi became aware of a handpiece overheating through a complaint input into the complaint database by a distributor (nsk america).Details are as follows: - the event occurred on (b)(6) 2023.- the dentist was performing a crown preparation procedure on a patient using the x85l handpiece (serial no.(b)(6)).- during the procedure, the handpiece head and headcap overheated, and the patient received a minor burn to the inside of their cheek.- no medical treatment was necessary for the injury at the time of the event.- the patient has had a follow-up visit with the dentist and the injury was reported to have healed normally without need for any additional medical treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The same adverse event in this report has been reported to the fda separately by the distributor, nsk america corporation, under report number 1422375-2023-00027.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event from the distributor, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device, which included measuring the operating temperature of the device [report no.(b)(4)].These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: a) nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject x85l device [dbd40080].There were no problems observed during manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.There were also no repair history records since the device was shipped.B) nakanishi conducted temperature testing of the returned device in the following manner: b.1) temperature sensors were attached to the exterior of the device at various test points.This included the point most proximal to the patient (testing point (1)) and points further toward the distal end of the device (testing points (2) through (4)).The test setup was prepared to take temperature measurements at all points simultaneously, including a reference measurement at ambient room temperature.B.2) nakanishi attached a thermocouple (sensor to measure temperature) to each of the testing points.Nakanishi rotated the device's motor at 40,000min-1, which is the maximum rpm for the motor that drives the handpiece (200,000min-1 for the handpiece), with water spray, and measured the exothermic response.B.3) nakanishi measured the temperature rise of the returned handpiece set at 200,000min-1 (motor revolution 40,000min-1).Nakanishi observed an abnormal temperature rise at the test point (2) about 10 seconds into the test.Temperature measurements about 30 seconds after the start of the test were as follows: - test point (1): 50.2 degrees c.- test point (2): 68.6 degrees c.- test point (3): 29.8 degrees c.- test point (4): 29.5 degrees c.The increase in temperature was so sudden that the test was concluded about 30 seconds into the planned 5-mimute evaluation period.Identification of the specific failure mode(s) and/or mechanism(s) of the associated device components was conducted as follows: a) nakanishi disassembled the handpiece and performed a visual inspection of the internal parts.Nakanishi observed the following: - the bearing retainer in the ball bearing on the rear side of the cartridge was broken.- the internal parts were soiled, abraded, and discolored.B) nakanishi took photographs of all the disassembled parts and kept them in the investigation report no.C231212-02.Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: a) nakanishi identified that the cause of the handpiece overheating was abnormal resistance during rotation due to the broken bearing retainer.Nakanishi considers the possibility from many years of experience that the cause of the broken bearing retainer was the ingress of undesirable materials into the bearing, leading to abrasion.B) a lack of maintenance caused the accumulation of debris on the internal parts, which caused debris ingress into the bearing during rotation.This contributed to the handpiece overheating.C) in order to prevent a recurrence of the handpiece overheating, nakanishi took the following actions: c.1) nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed the clarity and understandability of the instructions.C.2) nakanishi reported the above evaluation results to the distributor and directed the distributor to remind the user of the importance of maintenance as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NSK
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
sean kaufman
1800 global parkway
hoffman estates, IL 60192
2245128921
MDR Report Key18315696
MDR Text Key330328933
Report Number9611253-2023-00069
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EGS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K972569
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/12/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberX85L
Device Catalogue NumberC604
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/06/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight190 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-