H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, images were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 03/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.One image provided was reviewed.The images show a fractured dualok wire.The distal portion of the wire is within the outer right breast, entirely within the breast, traversing a mass (presumably the intended target).The proximal portion of the wire is coiled on the skin at the entrance location.Upon discussion wire localization is performed prior to surgery in order to help the surgeon locate the area to be excised in the operating room.The wire is placed by the radiologist, with the tip of the wire at the site to be excised and the proximal portion of the wire remaining outside the breast so that the surgeon can follow the wire from the skin to the excision location.In this case, it appears that the wire fractured at some point during placement, leaving the tip of the wire in the breast at the excision site, but without a visible proximal end for the surgeon to see outside the breast.Fracture should not occur under typical conditions and if that is what occurred it would likely be due to a defective wire.It is also possible that this particular wire was placed under an unusual amount of stress or perhaps bent very sharply, which could cause a fracture.In this case, the wire fracture occurred very close to the skin so it likely was very easy for the surgeon the find the wire in the operating room and perform the surgery as planned.If the fracture occurred more distally, a second wire could be placed and both wires could be removed during surgery.Based on the image review the reported break is confirmed as the fracture was noted in the wire.A definitive root cause for the alleged break could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 03/2024), g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|