• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. CITADEL PLUS; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. CITADEL PLUS; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL Back to Search Results
Model Number FX811B3B3AMABB
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem Fall (1848)
Event Date 11/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The circumstances in which the patient fell from the bed are unknown.It is also unknown if the side rail were used at time of the event.The arjo service consultant was only able to establish that the rotation function was not turn on the mattress at that time.At time pick-up of the bed frame, the e410 error code was displayed on the side rail that could not be cleared by the arjo service consultant.The further device inspection revealed that the error code occurred due to the side rail internal cable malfunction.If the error e410 occurs, in the worst case scenario it may lead to the bed electrical repositioning functions being inoperative.No relation between the detected malfunction and the patient fall was found.This conclusion is in line with the customer¿s statement, there was no allegation from the nurse that the device had any malfunction that caused the patient¿s fall.Based on the collected information, the root cause of the claimed event could not be determined.According to the citadel plus instruction for use, 831.374 rev.I: ¿to minimize risk of falls or injury, the bed should always be in the lowest practical position when the patient is unattended.¿ ¿whether and how to use side rails or restraints is a decision that should be based on each patients needs and should be made by the patient and the patients family, physician and caregivers, with facility protocols in mind.Caregivers should assess risks and benefits of side rail / restraint use.¿ sum up, arjo device was used for the patient treatment when the event occurred and played a role in the event.The error code was displayed on the side rail, therefore, the citadel plus bed did not meet the performance specification.No relation between the detected malfunction and the patient fall was found.The complaint decided to be reportable due to the patient¿s fall.No injury was claimed.
 
Event Description
It was claimed by a nurse that a patient fell from a citadel plus bed frame.There was no allegation from the nurse that the device had any malfunction that caused the patient¿s fall.No injury was claimed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CITADEL PLUS
Type of Device
BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL  PL-62052
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL   PL-62052
Manufacturer Contact
katarzyna bobrow
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
668046472
MDR Report Key18326136
MDR Text Key330495182
Report Number3007420694-2023-00297
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNL
UDI-Device Identifier05055982756532
UDI-Public(01)05055982756532(11)200622
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX811B3B3AMABB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received12/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/22/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-