• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR DRAGONFLY OPSTAR IMAGING CATHETER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR DRAGONFLY OPSTAR IMAGING CATHETER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1014651
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Difficult to Advance (2920); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/29/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the dragonfly opstar catheter met some resistance as it tracked over the wire during advancement to the lesion.It did reach the lesion.This was used with the optis mobile cart, aptivue.The physician reported the resistance felt was normal and what would be expected with a short rx catheter.It was not known if the resistance was with anatomy or the wire.The dragonfly reached the uncalcified lesion in the mid left anterior descending coronary artery.The physician purged the dragonfly but did not see contrast remove blood from the lens.There was no contrast leak noted at the syringe connection.Contrast was injected a couple of times but it did not trigger pullback to happen.An injection was seen down the vessel, but was not seen on the oct screen.No error message was displayed.When the physician went to remove the dragonfly, it became stuck on the wire.Both the dragonfly and the wire were removed together as a single unit.There was no visible damage to the dragonfly when it came out of the body.Ivus (intravascular ultrasound) was used to complete the procedure.Once outside the body, the dragonfly had to be forcefully pulled to get it off the wire.Outside the anatomy, the sales representative was able to perform a pullback and did not see any blood or abnormality in the lens region.The physician intentionally manipulated the dragonfly post procedure, resulting in visible tip damage and damage to the guide wire exit port.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual and dimensional analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported difficulty removing the catheter, advancing the catheter, and activation failure were unable to be confirmed due to returned condition of the device and the operational context of the reported issues.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.A query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot was performed and revealed there is no indication of a lot level quality product issue.The investigation determined that the difficulties advancing, difficulty removing the catheter, and activation/pullback failure were likely related to operational context.There were kinks noted to the returned catheter sheath as well as tearing to the guidewire exit notch which resulted in a separation of the distal tip, which is suggests there was difficulty positioning or withdrawing the catheter.It is likely that the observed condition and damage (kinks and torn guidewire exit notch) to the returned catheter contributed or caused the reported difficulty advancing and removing the catheter.The optical fiber of the returned device was revealed to have remained intact.There was one (1) successful pullback recorded on the returned device.The observed damage (torn sheath resulting in distal tip separation) was confirmed to have occurred after use, and during post-procedure handling.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DRAGONFLY OPSTAR IMAGING CATHETER
Type of Device
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL REG#3009600098
4 robbins rd
westford MA 01886
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key18351805
MDR Text Key330873794
Report Number2024168-2023-14200
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier05415067031129
UDI-Public05415067031129
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K192019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1014651
Device Lot Number10029114
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/29/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/18/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/09/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/11/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-