The device was subject to an on-site evaluation by an engineer of the local dräger s&s organization.Log file evaluation revealed the supervisor software had detected two consecutive encoder check errors (wrong motor position) during the concerned procedure and forced a shut-down of automatic ventilation which was accompanied by a corresponding alarm.The device was further used in manual ventilation mode then until a replacement device was made available.An in-depth evaluation of the replaced motor unit was not considered necessary - evaluation of earlier reported similar events revealed that wear-and-tear related abrasion of the collector disc had resulted in development of positions where the motor does not provide mechanic power due to contact interrupts to the carbon brushes; speed fluctuations will be the consequence.The speed fluctuations result in a deviation between measured and expected piston position.The piston hub defines the applied tidal volume and thus, to prevent from potentially hazardous output and/or from damages to the ventilator unit, the system is designed to shut down automatic ventilation and to alert the user to this condition by means of a corresponding alarm.As confirmed for the particular case, manual ventilation and the monitoring functions remain available to the full extent.Dräger finally concludes that the device behaved as specified upon the malfunction of a single component after 10 years of use; no patient consequences have been reported.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.The entire motor assembly was replaced, the device passed all consecutive tests and could be returned to use.
|