• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00
Device Problems Contamination (1120); Scratched Material (3020); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/30/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4 (patient weight), a5 (ethnicity): unknown/ asked but not available.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable as the lens remains implanted.Section h3-other (81): the intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation as the lens remains implanted; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, the information was not available.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
A doctor reported that he had an intraocular lens (iol) where the trailing haptic was stuck to the lens which he said to be not uncommon.When the doctor tried to tug the haptic off, it was very stuck (tenacious) and did not pop off like usual.When the doctor did get it to pop off, there was a chunk of something left on the haptic that looked stringy, like rubber cement as he pulled it away.The doctor could not pull the glob off the haptic and it ended up in the periphery of the patient¿s eye.The doctor felt it was too risky at this point to try to remove the glob.It was indicated that there is a small mark on the lens as well where it was attached.The doctor was very disturbed about this issue.It was noted that tiny amount of material remains at anterior lens surface - periphery of optic, no inflammation noted.(doctor dilated patient for 1-week exam).There was no patient injury or complications such as capsule tear reported.There was no medication outside the standard of care prescribed, no vitrectomy required, and no sutures used.The lens remains implanted in patient¿s right eye.The current patient outcome is good, and the reported issue did not impact the patient's visual acuity, no visual issues.The doctor¿s next plan of action is observation as long as recovery normal.No further information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18389193
MDR Text Key331497101
Report Number3012236936-2023-03275
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P980040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDCB00
Device Catalogue NumberDCB0000215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/16/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-