• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number SONATA
Device Problem Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
Patient Problem Tissue Breakdown (2681)
Event Date 12/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The parents reported on (b)(6) 2023, that swelling and redness were seen over the implant site.The recipient was suggested to stop wearing the audio processor (ap) for a while to see if the edema could be resolved.After about 15 days, the recipient recovered from the edema and started to wait the ap again.However, on (b)(6) 2023 the parents reported that the edema occurred again and overtime gradually turned into ulceration.Furthermore, the implant started to extrude.Moreover, effusion draining was performed, the fluid was reddish-brown, but fluid check was not conducted.The recipient has been explanted.Re-implantation is considered after the skin flap healed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been explanted and should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: device investigation of the received parts did not reveal any device defect or damage, which has been present whilst implanted.Mechanical damages found during investigation are attributable to the removal surgery.According to the information received from the field the device was explanted due to a swelling and extrusion of the device through the skin.A review of the device_s sterilization records show that the device has been subject to a valid sterilization process, thus no available information points to the implant being the source of any infection.However, a device contribution to the subsequent development of the extrusion cannot be ruled out.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
The parents reported on (b)(6) 2023, that swelling and redness were seen over the implant site.The recipient was suggested to stop wearing the audio processor (ap) for a while to see if the edema could be resolved.After about 15 days, the recipient recovered from the edema and started to wait the ap again.However, on 01-sep-2023 the parents reported that the edema occurred again and overtime gradually turned into ulceration.Furthermore, the implant started to extrude.Moreover, effusion draining was performed, the fluid was reddish-brown, but fluid check was not conducted.The recipient has been explanted and re-implanted at a later date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key18397142
MDR Text Key331363369
Report Number9710014-2023-01146
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737083618
UDI-Public(01)09008737083618
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/26/2023
Device Model NumberSONATA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/19/2023
Initial Date FDA Received12/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/19/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/18/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/26/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age34 MO
Patient SexFemale
-
-