Catalog Number D134805 |
Device Problem
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problem
Heart Block (4444)
|
Event Date 11/29/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device investigation details: the device has been reported as discarded, therefore no product investigation can be performed, and the customer complaint cannot be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 31142099l number, and no internal action related to the complaint was found during the review.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.E1.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's ref.# (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) ablation procedure with a thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter and the patient experienced heart block treated with surgical intervention.During superior vena cava isolation (svci), 70 minutes after the start of the procedure (toward the end of svci during pulmonary vein isolation (pvi), cavotricuspid ishmus (cti), and svci), bradycardia occurred suddenly and it took about 5 minutes for the patient¿s own pulse to return.During the time, backup pacing was performed with an intracardiac electrode catheter.The patient¿s own pulse returned, but a temporary pacemaker was placed just to be safe because the patient had a history of sss (sick sinus syndrome).Patient outcome is improved.The physician's comment on the relationship between the event and the product was ¿since the patient had a history of sss and syncopal attacks, it is not clear whether it was transient or accidental due to ablation near sinus node.¿ there were no abnormalities observed before or during using the product.The pacing by pacemaker was not required and in 2 days, the patient was discharged after removing pacemaker.Patient has fully recovered.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|