Product complaint # (b)(4).D4: the device catalog number is unknown; therefore, udi is unavailable.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
The patient had her hip replaced in 2001.She had a duraloc cup and a replica stem.Recently, her replica stem broke in half.So doctor decided to perform revision surgery.The doctor was unable to remove the distal portion that broke off.So that stayed in the canal.Loosening of the replica stem is also indicated at bone to implant interface.Doi: 2001.Dor: december 14, 2023.Affected side: right hip.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received: the patient had her hip replaced in 2001.She had a duraloc cup and a replica stem.Recently, her replica stem broke in half.So doctor decided to perform revision surgery.The doctor was unable to remove the distal portion that broke off.So that stayed in the canal.Loosening of the replica stem is also indicated at bone to implant interface.The product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See ((b)(4) device photo ad 19 dec 2023 (1), (b)(4) device photo ad 19 dec 2023 (2), (b)(4) device photo ad 19 dec 2023 (3), (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (4).Jpg, (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (5).Jpg, (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (06).Jpg, (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (07)jpg, (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (08).Jpg, (b)(4) x-ray fillms ad 15 dec 2023, (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (1), (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (2), (b)(4) x-ray flims ad 15 dec 2023 (3)).The photo/x-ray investigation revealed that unk hip acetabular cup duraloc appears to be positioned more vertically and with more anteversion than recommended.The mode of failure of the device is multi-factorial and consideration must be given to all other potential influences such as surgical process, patient variables (e.G.Activity level and use), anatomical considerations and patient changes over time.Any conclusions from the investigational input provided have to be placed into context with all other relevant factors.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the unk hip acetabular cup duraloc would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, a potential cause cannot be established and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot - the device lot number is unknown, therefore a device history review could not be performed.If the lot/serial number becomes available, the record will be re-assessed.
|