|
Catalog Number TF-23A |
Device Problems
Calcified (1077); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008); Device Stenosis (4066); Central Regurgitation (4068)
|
Patient Problems
Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Dyspnea (1816); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
|
Event Date 10/01/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.Literature attachment: article title "early structural valve deterioration of trifecta aortic bioprosthesis : report of a case".
|
|
Event Description
|
The article, "early structural valve deterioration of trifecta aortic bioprosthesis : report of a case", was reviewed.The article presented a case study of a 60-year-old male patient who underwent aortic valve replacement.It was reported that on an unknown date, a 23mm trifecta valve was implanted.Seven years post-procedure on an unknown date, the patient presented with progressive dyspnea, severe aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis.It was noted intraoperatively there was a large laceration in the left coronary cusp adjacent to the non-coronary and left coronary commissure and leaflet calcification.Further investigation noted circumferential fibrous pannus ingrowth at the inflow portion.A decision was made to explant the trifecta valve and replaced with an inspiris valve of unknown size.The patient additionally underwent concomitant mitral valve plasty and left atrial appendage clipping.The patient was reported stable and transferred to a rehabilitation facility on the 36th postoperative day.[the primary author was keita tanaka, japanese red cross medical center, tokyo, japan.].
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Summarized patient outcomes/complications of trifecta valve were reported in a research article in a subject population with unknown co-morbidities.Some of the complications reported were surgical intervention, hospitalization, dyspnea, aortic valve regurgitation, aortic valve stenosis, torn cusp, calcified device and pannus.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review and no device or individual patient information was received for analysis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|