Model Number G447 |
Device Problems
Device Alarm System (1012); Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Failure to Capture (1081); Failure to Read Input Signal (1581); Low impedance (2285); High Capture Threshold (3266)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/03/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with this recently implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) contacted boston scientific technical services (ts) indicating that they heard beeping tones after the implant procedure.Ts reviewed data from the device and did not find any abnormalities that could have triggered beeping tones, but it was observed that high left ventricular (lv) pacing threshold measurements and lv loss of capture on the presenting electrograms (egm) were present.Further investigation also found that the left ventricular autothreshold (lvat) was greater than the programmed amplitude or suspended, and the same observation for the right atrial autothreshold (raat), but in this case, it was due to noise or low evoked response (er) as this is a recent implant.Ts recommended an in-office visit to verify lv lead location via x-ray imaging and to evaluate if there are other lv configurations with better pacing performance.A commanded raat was also recommended to re-evaluate the right atrial (ra) automatic threshold measurement, and a manual ra threshold to verify lead performance.At this time, no further information is available.No adverse patient effects were reported.The device remains in service.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with this recently implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) contacted boston scientific technical services (ts) indicating that they heard beeping tones after the implant procedure.Ts reviewed data from the device and did not find any abnormalities that could have triggered beeping tones, but it was observed that high left ventricular (lv) pacing threshold measurements and lv loss of capture on the presenting electrograms (egm) were present.Further investigation also found that the left ventricular autothreshold (lvat) was greater than the programmed amplitude or suspended, and the same observation for the right atrial autothreshold (raat), but in this case, it was due to noise or low evoked response (er) as this is a recent implant.Ts recommended an in-office visit to verify lv lead location via x-ray imaging and to evaluate if there are other lv configurations with better pacing performance.A commanded raat was also recommended to re-evaluate the right atrial (ra) automatic threshold measurement, and a manual ra threshold to verify lead performance.At this time, no further information is available.No adverse patient effects were reported.The device remains in service.The cause of the reported observations is still unknown at this time.Evidence suggests that this device remains in service.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|