Investigation results: a microscopical visual inspection of the provided two pieces was made (the broken pin).Here it was found that the minor piece (the screw driver shaped tip) was bent and the blade warped.Following this, the fracture surfaces were examined, both the smaller and the larger fragment.Here were found heavy traces of corrosion and beyond the corrosion, the typical signs of a forced fracture were noted.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all leading device(s) lot numbers and the products found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are no similar complaints against the same lot number.According to manufacturer's reporting evaluation in accordance with 21 cfr part 803, section 803.3, this event is considered reportable for the following reason - adverse event (not later than 30 days).The assessment for the reportability of this adverse event was based on the patient harm, additional medical intervention necessary.Conclusion/preventive measures: the bending and the fracture surface are signs for unusually strong forces.Furthermore in the complaint text was noticed, that the pin was used several times (assumed to be in the same surgery).The instructions for use (ifu) points out that the pin may only be used once ("breakage or bending of the abc / quintex temporary fixation pins due to repeated application" according to ifu document number: (b)(4) change no.58).A material failure or a production error can be ruled out.As shown in the statistics, this is the only error of this type in this lot (which contains 597 pcs.) and in the last five years.Based on these facts, we assume a user error as the cause of the failure in this complaint.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not required.
|