C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD® NASOGASTRIC SUMP TUBE AND PREVENT® FILTER AND LOPEZ VALVE® WITH ENFIT; NASOGASTRIC TUBE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number EN0056140 |
Device Problem
Incorrect Measurement (1383)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/12/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the currently stocked bard sump nasogastric tubes were not draining appropriately when connected to suction drainage.Customer was told of up to 4 instances where the tube had to be replaced shortly after being placed due to clogging or not draining.This resulted in delays in care for their patient (i.E.Drainage of stomach contents), and dissatisfaction with multiple invasive procedures to replace tubes, not to mention the additional x-rays exposure required to verify tube placement.Compared to the covidien ng salem sump tubes customer had been using, the size of the hole to allow drainage from suction was significantly smaller in the bard.There was another set of staff with the same concerns.Customer had multiple areas expressed concerns with the bard sub for the nasogastric tubes.Customer thought the bard tube should be pulled from use immediately.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon further review, bd has determined that this mdr was reported in error as it was found to be a cascading failure of an event previously reported.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the currently stocked bard sump nasogastric tubes were not draining appropriately when connected to suction drainage.Customer was told of up to 4 instances where the tube had to be replaced shortly after being placed due to clogging or not draining.This resulted in delays in care for their patient (i.E.Drainage of stomach contents), and dissatisfaction with multiple invasive procedures to replace tubes, not to mention the additional x-rays exposure required to verify tube placement.Compared to the covidien ng salem sump tubes customer had been using, the size of the hole to allow drainage from suction was significantly smaller in the bard.There was another set of staff with the same concerns.Customer had multiple areas expressed concerns with the bard sub for the nasogastric tubes.Customer thought the bard tube should be pulled from use immediately.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|