• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Device Problems Insufficient Information (3190); Device Stenosis (4066)
Patient Problems Dyspnea (1816); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/19/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a 29mm 11500a aortic valve is under evaluation for a valve in valve procedure after an implant duration of five (5) years, eight (8) days due to unknown reasons.The tavr has not been scheduled.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was reported and learned through investigation that a patient with a 29mm 11500a aortic valve underwent a valve in valve procedure after an implant duration of five (5) years, two months due to stenosis.The patient presented with heart failure and shortness of breath.Tavr was completed with a 29mm 9600tfx transcatheter valve.The patient was in stable condition at the end of the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: b4, b5, b7, d4, e1, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6 (component code, impact code, clinical code, device code, initial reporter, type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions).The device history record (dhr) review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Engineering evaluation summary: stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potentials known and unknown patient-related contributing factors.Per technical summary 33069, rev a, structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, noncalcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes, occurring singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.Stenosis is most commonly related to patient factors and is not usually an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.Devices implanted 5 years or greater with calcification, dehiscence, leaflet tears, thickened leaflet, pannus, or structural valve deterioration (stenosis, regurgitation) reported as the complaint do not require an engineering evaluation.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.A capa/scar/pra is not required as there is no confirmed product, or labeling non-conformances and no other triggers are met.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient factors likely caused or contributed.All pertinent information available to edwards lifesciences has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key18461439
MDR Text Key332250824
Report Number2015691-2024-00129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103195019
UDI-Public(01)00690103195019(17)200814
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/07/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/14/2020
Device Model Number11500A
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/15/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention; Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
Patient Age46 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-