This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 4111.H6: investigation findings code was added: 3252.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4307.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported biomet screw for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed, a fracture has been identified inside the implant.Dhr, sterilization, and complaint history review could not be performed, as the subject lot number associated with the [unknown biomet screw] is not available.Zimvie quality management system (qms) has controls in place to prevent the distribution of non-conforming product and ensure the product is within specifications.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was material selection of the product is not adequate to withstand occlusal forces.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction did occur.The fracture has been identified inside implant.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|