• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PROGRIP; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PROGRIP; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Model Number LPG1614
Device Problem Difficult to Insert (1316)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/12/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant product: lpg1614, lpg1614 14x16cm parietex lap progripx1 (lot#pxf0947x) h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was not returned, but a photo was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted one image depicts the commercial box showing the lot number and expiration date.Another image depicts the mesh through a component.The textile knitting pattern seems to match with progrip¿ laparoscopic self-fixating mesh.The last image relative to the mesh depicts the contaminated mesh outside the abdominal wall.The component (part of the balloon port?) is visible, stuck in the middle of the mesh.The tear of the mesh reported is not visible.It was reported that the user experienced difficulty in the insertion or removal of the device to or from the port.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a bilateral total extraperitoneal (tep) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, the first mesh was cut, folded, and placed down the structural balloon port with no issue.The next mesh was cut and folded the same way, placed down the structural port, and became stuck in the middle of the port.The surgeon forced it down, and it got caught in the seal and teared it off.The seal of the structural balloon fell into the patient's cavity and was able to be retrieved.A new structural balloon and mesh were used with the same lot for both devices to resolve the issue.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The commercial box, aluminum pouch, instructions for use (ifu) and three photos were available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that all the packaging were opened.It was reported that the mesh became stuck in the middle of the port of the balloon.The surgeon forced it down, and it got caught in the seal and teared it off.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGRIP
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR  01600
Manufacturer (Section G)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR   01600
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key18488810
MDR Text Key332994699
Report Number9615742-2024-00070
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K143386
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/10/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLPG1614
Device Catalogue NumberLPG1614
Device Lot NumberPXF0947X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/14/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10
-
-