|
Catalog Number MD800F |
Device Problems
Malposition of Device (2616); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/15/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 09/2012) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was deployed successfully, in a patient with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.It was further reported that nine years eight months and five days post a filter deployment, the filter allegedly tilted, strut curved and perforated the inferior vena cava.Reportedly, the device has not been removed.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was deployed successfully, in a patient with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.It was further reported that nine years, eight months and five days post a filter deployment, the filter allegedly tilted posteriorly and one of the midline anterior strut was curved anteriorly.Furthermore, a right anterior strut had perforated the inferior vena cava and entered the third portion of the duodenum.Reportedly, the device has not been removed.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately nine years and eight months post filter deployment, a computed tomography of abdomen showed the filter tilted posteriorly.Proximal end was at l1 level.None of the prong¿s color broken.The midline anterior prong was curved anteriorly.Right anterior prong extends 6 mm beyond the inferior vena cava wall and enters or compresses the 3rd portion of the duodenum.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported perforation of inferior vena cava, filter tilt and filter prong bent.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: b5, d4 (expiration date: 09/2012), g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|