A dräger service engineer was dispatched who checked the device on-site and was unable to duplicate the reported ventilator failure - the device passed all tests without deviations and ventilated in all modes as expected.The log file was evaluated by the manufacturer.It can be confirmed that the device posted a ventilator failure alarm at 07:39 am on the given date of event.The log further indicates that the device ran on battery before until the latter was fully depleted and, the device shut itself off around 07:35 am.Obviusly the users quickly reconnected the device to mains supply afterwards because the device powered-up again and attempted to resume the previously used ventilation mode.This was volume-controlled automatic ventilation in the particular case.Due to the interrupt in ventilation before, the ventilator piston had no position referencing data and, automatic ventilation did not re-start to avoid potential damages to the ventilator unit.The users have then rebooted the device as reported.The reboot procedure includes an automatic piston position referentiation which explains that automatic ventilation was available again after the reboot.The log further indicates that the device had posted a battery low alarm (residual capacity <10%) already at 07:00 am.Dräger concludes that the device behaved as specified during the particular situation - automatic ventilation was not started upon return of electrical energy due to unclear ventilator piston position.Manual ventilation with the built-in breathing bag is still possible.Finally, the case must be attributed to use error - the device clearly indicates when it runs on battery due to missing mains power.The battery depletion alarm was posted more than 30 minutes before the device finally run out of energy and shut down - the users have ignored the warnings.The fact that the device could be operated for >30 minutes after the residual battery capacity underran 10% is exceeding the specified runtime significantly.
|