• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX20A
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Unintended Collision (1429); Perivalvular Leak (1457); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 12/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist (fcs), during a transfemoral tavr procedure with a 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve, aortic insufficiency was noted.The patient underwent a valve in valve procedure with a second 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Instigation is still ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still ongoing.
 
Event Description
It was initially reported by the field clinical specialist (fcs), that during a transfemoral tavr procedure with a 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve, aortic insufficiency was noted.The patient underwent a valve in valve procedure with a second 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve.However, per medical records received, the 20mm sapien 3 ultra valve was implanted in a surgical valve with the intent to post dilation and fracture the surgical prosthesis.This led to severe aortic regurgitation requiring a second valve.The valve in valve procedure was successfully performed.A repeat echo report was done showing no paravalvular leakage.Then the valvuloplasty system was retrieved, and the team attempted to retrieve the stent which had dislodged from the balloon due to acute angulation of the left main takeoff and the frame of the 3 prosthesis valves.The team elected to deploy the stent and place it between the 3 stent frames.The patient tolerated the procedure well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The events reported are anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.Per the technical summary, the ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Potential root causes for central regurgitation at time of implant includes valve malposition, slow recovery of blood flow, leaflet impingement due to calcification (for native landing zone), leaflet impingement due to guidewire, over inflation/ post-dilation, and under expansion.Typically, mild regurgitation is not unusual after initial valve replacement, and is usually tolerated by patients.Often moderate to high regurgitation requiring reoperation in the immediate post-operative period is due to patient and procedural related issues and is unrelated to the device.However, advances in valve design and bioprosthetic material have been made with the intention of reducing central leaks by providing more efficient hemodynamics and longer tissue durability.The complaints for deployed valve exhibits regurgitation and interventional device interacts with coronary stent were confirmed based on provided medical record.As such, available information suggests that procedural factors (post-dilation and maneuvering of non-edwards device relative to deployed valve) may have contributed to the reported event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18515186
MDR Text Key332880322
Report Number2015691-2024-00416
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103201314
UDI-Public(01)00690103201314(17)260927
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/15/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9750TFX20A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/28/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-