• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE, 29MM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE, 29MM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9755RSL29A
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 12/22/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.H3 other text : the valve remains implanted in the patient.
 
Event Description
As reported by the edwards field clinical specialist, approximately 3 days post tavr, a 2nd 29mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve was successfully implanted in a 29mm s3ur due to moderate/severe central regurgitation and moderate paravalvular leak.The patient was stable and discharged home.Both central and pvl was resolved after 2nd valve.Per report, an additional 5ccs of fluid to the nominal prep volume was added and may have caused overexpansion resulting in leaflet damage.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Update to h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions) and h10 to reflect device evaluation.The event reported is an anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Per the technical summary, the ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.During the manufacturing process, all sapien 3 ultra resilia valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% tested for proper coaptation under physiological backpressure conditions prior to release for distribution.Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect or device malfunction contributed to the complaint event.Per the instructions for use (ifu), valve regurgitation (including paravalvular leak (pvl) and transvalvular leak (central)) are known potential adverse events associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to valve regurgitation including, but not limited to, malposition of the valve, inaccurate measurement of the native valve annulus, uneven distribution of calcium on the native valve, bulky or severe calcification, a severely elliptical annulus shape, and valve under-sizing.Paravalvular leak refers to blood flowing through a channel between the structure of the implanted valve and the cardiac tissue due to lack of appropriate sealing of the valve to the target site.Some pvl is not uncommon post-deployment.Many cases are mild to moderate, and either resolve over time or do not cause symptoms.Others may be more clinically significant and require intervention.In this case, the central regurgitation and paravalvular leak were unable to be confirmed based on unavailability of imaging or medical report.The available information suggests (procedural factors - over expanded valve) may have contributed to the reported central regurgitation.A conclusive root cause was unable to be determined for the paravalvular leak.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE, 29MM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18522771
MDR Text Key332974347
Report Number2015691-2024-00440
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103215823
UDI-Public(01)00690103215823(17)260508(11)2305092110539363
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9755RSL29A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/16/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/24/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/09/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-