• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number TJF-Q180V
Device Problems Crack (1135); Failure to Clean Adequately (4048)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation and the customer's complaint was confirmed.In addition to the malfunction reported in section b5 the following findings were discovered; the red paint around suction cylinder was faded or missing, the angulation was reduced due to stretched angle wires, the insertion tube was deformed or snaky, the coating on the universal cord was peeled off, there was a gap of adhesive on the distal end, the knob wire was disconnected, and multiple parts of the scope had damage or deformation due to physical stress.The investigation is ongoing and follow up with the user facility is currently being performed.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided by the user facility.
 
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus, the duodenovideoscope had a broken cable.The device was returned for evaluation.During the device evaluation, the following reportable malfunctions were found: a stained lens and a crack on the distal end of the device.There were no reports of patient harm.This medical device report (mdr) is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunction found during evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.Additionally, (h4) device manufacturer date was added and the following correction to (b5): it was stated that during the device evaluation, the following reportable malfunctions were found: a stained lens and a crack on the distal end of the device.Correction: the only reportable malfunction identified during the device evaluation was that the distal end was cracked.The stained lens was included in error.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 7 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, the cracked distal end may have resulted from physical or chemical stress.However, the specific cause of the damage could not be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18531162
MDR Text Key333103726
Report Number9610595-2024-01063
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDT
UDI-Device Identifier04953170367311
UDI-Public04953170367311
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
PMA/PMN Number
K143153
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTJF-Q180V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/27/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received01/17/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/06/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-