(b)(4).Date sent: 1/18/2024 d6a: exact implant date is unk.Assumed 1st day of the month.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? reflux returned / (b)(6) 2023 what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com unknown date of imaging ¿ attempting to gain image currently what is the device lot number? unknown was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? yes were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? none reported did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? no mri did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? none reported was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.Upper gi prior to the explant is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? device was explanted and no other surgical procedure performed this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
(b)(4).Investigation summary: a linx device with a visible weld ball that disconnected from a washer was returned to the analysis site.The link length and tensile force measurements were found to meet the applicable specifications during device analysis.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the visible weld ball, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure, tooling marks were noted in some beads.The device was scanned using computer tomography (ct), optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.The washer through-hole at the separation was measured and was greater than the specification.The washer through-hole was concentric with material displacement at the outer edge of the through hole.The overall appearance of the surface of the washer through hole didn¿t exhibit gross loss of shape.The top view of the diameter of the exposed weld ball was measured.This diameter is within the specification.The weld ball was concentric with the respect to the wire.
|