No images were provided, but the patient's revision surgery confirms the event.The patient initially received bilateral devices on (b)(6) 2008.Stryker was informed on (b)(6) 2023, that the surgeon removed the right-side fossa component that had perforated into the middle cranial fossa.Although further information was requested, none was provided despite several attempts.The attachment intake report indicates that the device was removed without dural damage.However, the breakage of the device may have led to a secondary failure mode, possibly an infection.If additional information becomes available, the investigation will be reopened.Based on the investigation, there is no indication of an incorrectly working product or any design, material, or manufacturing-related issue.
|