• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number L321
Device Problems Failure to Capture (1081); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Inappropriate or Unexpected Reset (2959); High Capture Threshold (3266)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/03/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The local area field representative was contacted for additional information.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker system was hospitalized due to loss of pacing and worsening heart failure.Upon interrogation, it was determined that the pacemaker had entered safety mode and switched to unipolar mode.It was suspected that there was loss of capture (loc) at 5v in unipolar, rather than unipolar oversensing with pacing inhibition, as paced signals were observed.Subsequently, this pacemaker was explanted and replaced with another manufacturer's device.Upon connecting the chronic lead with the new device, a threshold measurement of 4v was observed in bipolar.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This pacemaker has been returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been received for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of analysis.Correction to b5: edited to reflect new output of 4v, not threshold measurement.Correction to h6: removed high capture threshold code, as there was no allegation of high thresholds.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker system was hospitalized due to loss of pacing and worsening heart failure.Upon interrogation, it was determined that the pacemaker had entered safety mode and switched to unipolar mode.It was suspected that there was loss of capture (loc) at 5v in unipolar, rather than unipolar oversensing with pacing inhibition, as paced signals were observed.Subsequently, this pacemaker was explanted and replaced with another manufacturer's device.Upon connecting the chronic lead with the new device, output was set to 4v in bipolar.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This pacemaker has been returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been received for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of analysis.Correction to b5: edited to reflect new output of 4v, not threshold measurement.Correction to h6: removed high capture threshold code, as there was no allegation of high thresholds.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.Device telemetry data confirmed it was operating in safety mode, determined it had undergone resets, and that bradycardia therapy remained available.Engineers determined that this device was demonstrating behavior consistent with a high internal cell impedance within the battery.The high internal impedance put this device at risk of experiencing transient voltage decreases (and associated resets) during periods of high-power consumption.When battery voltage drops below a minimum threshold, a system reset is performed.If three system resets occur within a 48-hour period, the device is designed to immediately enter safety mode operation to maintain back-up pacing with pre-defined, non-programmable settings.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker system was hospitalized due to loss of pacing and worsening heart failure.Upon interrogation, it was determined that the pacemaker had entered safety mode and switched to unipolar mode.It was suspected that there was loss of capture (loc) at 5v in unipolar, rather than unipolar oversensing with pacing inhibition, as paced signals were observed.Subsequently, this pacemaker was explanted and replaced with another manufacturer's device.Upon connecting the chronic lead with the new device, output was set to 4v in bipolar.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This pacemaker has been returned for analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCOLADE EL DR
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key18567978
MDR Text Key333536064
Report Number2124215-2024-03538
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
N970003/S167
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Replace
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/23/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/10/2018
Device Model NumberL321
Device Catalogue NumberL321
Device Lot Number716497
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/22/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/21/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-