As reported, during a transurethral endoscopy (tul), a urinary stone in the renal pelvis and ureter was scheduled to be crushed and retrieved.During the first attempt to retrieve a stone in the inferior renal calyx, an ncircle delta wire tipless stone extractor's basket failed to deploy.The device performed well when checked in an uncoiled position, for its function prior to use.During its use, the device worked well in a straight position, but could not be operated when it was bent (the endoscope was angled).Per the reporter, the patient's anatomy did not contribute to the malfunction of the device.A laser was not used with the complaint device.Another same type device was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain in the patient.The patient did not require any other additional intervention or experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Event summary as reported, during a transurethral endoscopy (tul), a urinary stone in the renal pelvis and ureter was scheduled to be crushed and retrieved.During the first attempt to retrieve a stone in the inferior renal calyx, an ncircle delta wire tipless stone extractor's basket failed to deploy.The device performed well when checked in an uncoiled position, for its function prior to use.During its use, the device worked well in a straight position, but could not be operated when it was bent (the endoscope was angled).Per the reporter, the patient's anatomy did not contribute to the malfunction of the device.A laser was not used with the complaint device.Another same type device was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain in the patient.The patient did not require any other additional intervention or experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation a document based investigation was performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), and quality control (qc) procedures.A visual inspection and functional test of the device were conducted during the investigation.One device was returned in open packaging with the label.When the handle was actuated, the basket opened/closed as intended.There was no damage to the device noted.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records found no other complaints reported for the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing and quality control documents was conducted.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The product ifu, t _ ntse_ rev1; the ifu did not provide any information related to the reported issue.Based on the available information, cook has concluded a cause for the issue could not be established.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per a review of risk documentation, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|