• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION WALLFLEX COLONIC SOFT STENT SYSTEM WITH ANCHOR LOCK DELIVERY SYSTEM; STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION WALLFLEX COLONIC SOFT STENT SYSTEM WITH ANCHOR LOCK DELIVERY SYSTEM; STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Device Stenosis (4066)
Patient Problems Bowel Perforation (2668); Restenosis (4576)
Event Date 11/18/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Block b3: the exact date of event was not reported.The article published date is used for the estimated date of event.Block d4, h4: the literature article did not provide the suspect device upn and lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block g2: literature source: papachrysos, n., et al."outcome of self-expandable metal stents placement for obstructive colorectal cancer: 7 years' experience from a swedish tertiary center" surgical endoscopy (2023) 37:2653-2658; doi 10.1007/s00464-022-09761-2 block h6: imdrf patient code e1006 captures the reportable patient complication of bowel perforation.Imdrf patient code e233701 captures the reportable patient complication of restenosis.Imdrf impact code f2202 captures the additional endoscopic procedure.Imdrf impact code f2301 captures the additional stents implanted.Imdrf device code a0106 captures the reportable event of stent obstruction within device.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific corporation became aware of the following event through the article "outcome of self-expandable metal stents placement for obstructive colorectal cancer: 7 years' experience from a swedish tertiary center", by papachrysos, n., et al.The study aims to review the outcomes of self-expanding metal stent (sems) treatment in a tertiary center and to find predictors for the clinical outcome.The data were analyzed from sems insertion at (b)(6), between 2014 and 2020.Patients were identified through an administrative database that continuously registered all the sems insertions.The inclusion criteria were computed tomography ct verified acute colonic obstruction or progressive obstructive symptoms in patients already diagnosed with colorectal cancer.The obstruction was located from the right colon to the rectum.The purpose of stenting was either palliation or bridging to surgery.According to the literature, a total of 265 self-expanding metal stents (sems) insertions (mean age 72, female 49.4%) were identified.Most sems were used for palliation (90.2%).The malign obstruction was most often located in the left colon (71.7%).All procedure were performed using wallflex colonic and wallflex soft stents uncovered.Patients were placed under conscious sedation.Stent deployment was performed over the guidewire by the through-the-scope tts technique.Correct positioning was assured by fluoroscopy.According to the article, technical success was achieved in 259 (97.7%) cases and clinical success in 244 (92.1%) cases.Eleven patients (4.2%) had a perforation during the first 48 postoperative hours and were immediately evaluated by a colorectal surgeon.In 16 patients a second self-expanding metal stent (sems) and in 5 patients a third self-expanding metal stent (sems) were placed after tumor invasion and restenosis of the stent.The second sems were placed 2-36 months after the first one.
 
Event Description
Boston scientific corporation became aware of the following event through the article "outcome of self-expandable metal stents placement for obstructive colorectal cancer: 7 years' experience from a swedish tertiary center", by papachrysos, n., et al.The study aims to review the outcomes of self-expanding metal stent (sems) treatment in a tertiary center and to find predictors for the clinical outcome.The data were analyzed from sems insertion at sahlgrenska university hospital, between 2014 and 2020.Patients were identified through an administrative database that continuously registered all the sems insertions.The inclusion criteria were computed tomography ct verified acute colonic obstruction or progressive obstructive symptoms in patients already diagnosed with colorectal cancer.The obstruction was located from the right colon to the rectum.The purpose of stenting was either palliation or bridging to surgery.According to the literature, a total of 265 self-expanding metal stents (sems) insertions (mean age 72, female 49.4%) were identified.Most sems were used for palliation (90.2%).The malign obstruction was most often located in the left colon (71.7%).All procedure were performed using wallflex colonic and wallflex soft stents uncovered.Patients were placed under conscious sedation.Stent deployment was performed over the guidewire by the through-the-scope tts technique.Correct positioning was assured by fluoroscopy.According to the article, technical success was achieved in 259 (97.7%) cases and clinical success in 244 (92.1%) cases.Eleven patients (4.2%) had a perforation during the first 48 postoperative hours and were immediately evaluated by a colorectal surgeon.In 16 patients a second self-expanding metal stent (sems) and in 5 patients a third self-expanding metal stent (sems) were placed after tumor invasion and restenosis of the stent.The second sems were placed 2-36 months after the first one.***additional information received on february 1, 2024*** according to the physician, the perforation was located in the middle of the stent body where the tumor was located.The patient's bowel perforation was confirmed via ct scan and an emergency surgery was performed to treat the perforation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block b3: the exact date of event was not reported.The article published date is used for the estimated date of event.Blocks b5 and h6 (impact codes) have been updated based on the additional information received on february 1, 2024.Block d4, h4: the literature article did not provide the suspect device upn and lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block g2: literature source: papachrysos, n., et al."outcome of self-expandable metal stents placement for obstructive colorectal cancer: 7 years' experience from a swedish tertiary center" surgical endoscopy (2023) 37:2653-2658; doi 10.1007/s00464-022-09761-2 block h6: imdrf patient code e1006 captures the reportable patient complication of bowel perforation.Imdrf patient code e233701 captures the reportable patient complication of restenosis.Imdrf impact code f19 captures the emergency surgery to resolve patient's bowel perforation.Imdrf impact code f2202 captures the additional endoscopic procedure.Imdrf impact code f2301 captures the additional stents implanted.Imdrf device code a0106 captures the reportable event of stent obstruction within device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WALLFLEX COLONIC SOFT STENT SYSTEM WITH ANCHOR LOCK DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key18581101
MDR Text Key333740865
Report Number3005099803-2024-00129
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MQR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSW
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/25/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/01/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-