Model Number 101-9814 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/29/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a superion indirect decompression (id) spacer broke during the procedure and as a result the procedure was aborted.X-ray imaging taken did not reveal any noticeable thick bone, osteophytes or obstructions causing resistance.It was noted the physician gear shifted properly and the spacer failure occurred after performing the sagittal wiggle, however it was unclear if excessive force was used during deployment.The physician confirmed all the damaged id spacer pieces were removed.The patient did well post-operatively.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a superion indirect decompression (id) spacer broke during the procedure and as a result the procedure was aborted.X-ray imaging taken did not reveal any noticeable thick bone, osteophytes or obstructions causing resistance.It was noted the physician gear shifted properly and the spacer failure occurred after performing the sagittal wiggle, however it was unclear if excessive force was used during deployment.The physician confirmed all the damaged id spacer pieces were removed.The patient did well post-operatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Analysis of the returned indirect decompression (id) spacer revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.The damage to the implant indicates the break was likely due to deployment against resistance and/or manipulation of the position of the device by gear shifting of the inserter.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label.Additionally, labeling states to not force deployment or implant breakage or damage to bony structures may result.Therefore, engineers concluded that unintended use error caused or contributed to the event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|