|
Catalog Number RBYPCLP15 |
Device Problem
Premature Separation (4045)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/12/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat an endoleak from the superior mesenteric artery (sma) to the inferior mesenteric artery (ima) using packing coil lps, a ruby coil lp, a lp system detachment handle (handle), and a non-penumbra microcatheter.It should be noted that the patient''s anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully placed a ruby coil lp into the target location using the microcatheter.The physician then advanced a packing coil lp into the target location using the microcatheter and attempted to detach it using the handle; however, the packing coil lp failed to detach.Therefore, the packing coil lp was removed.The physician then advanced another packing coil lp into the target location using the microcatheter and attempted to detach it using the same handle; however, the packing coil lp failed to detach.Therefore, the physician decided to remove the packing coil lp.While retracting the packing coil lp, it unintentionally detached.The physician then injected saline into the microcatheter and successfully implanted the detached packing coil lp into the target location.The procedure was completed using the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Please note that the following sections were incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and are being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report: 3005168196-2024-00034.Section d.Box 4.Lot #; section d.Box 4.Catalog #; section d.Box 4.Expiration date; section d.Box 4.Unique identifier; section h.Box 4.Device manufacture date.Please note that the following section was inadvertently missed on the initial mfr report and is being included on this follow-up #01 mfr report: 3005168196-2024-00034.Section d.Box 6.If implanted, give date.Evaluation of the returned packing coil lp pusher assembly confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was separated on the proximal end of the pusher assembly, the pull wire was retracted from the pusher assembly distal tip.If the pet lock is separated and the pull wire is retracted from the pusher assembly, the embolization coil will detach from the pusher assembly.The separated pet lock was likely due to the coil detachment attempted during the procedure.It was reported that the detached embolization coil was implanted into the target location by injecting saline into the microcatheter.Further evaluation revealed kinks along the length of the pusher assembly.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging of the device for return to penumbra.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|