• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE, 23MM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE, 23MM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9755RSL23A
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 01/10/2024
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by the edwards field clinical specialist, post valve deployment of a sapien 3 ultra resilia valve in the aortic position, mild to moderate central leak was noted.A 2nd sapien 3 ultra resilia valve was implanted and the central resolved.There was no harm to the patient.The perceived root cause was due to annular calcium, a couple of large deposits of calcium.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.H3 other text : the valve remains implanted in the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental report is being submitted with an update with correct serial number.The following sections of this report have been updated: d4: serial number, expiration date, and unique identifier (udi) number and h4: device manufacture date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Update to h2 (type of investigation, investigation findings and investigation conclusions) h6 and h10 to reflect engineering evaluation.The event reported is anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Per the technical summary, the ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The complaint for deployed valve exhibits central regurgitation is unable to be confirmed due to no imagery, medical report, nor device provided.A review of the dhr did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint event.A review of the ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.During the manufacturing process, all sapien 3 ultra resilia valves are 100% visually inspected for defects and 100% tested for proper coaptation under physiological backpressure conditions prior to release for distribution.Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a manufacturing defect or device malfunction contributed to the complaint event.In this case, significant calcium deposits were reported within the patient's annulus.Although transcatheter heart valve depends on native landing zone calcification for anchoring, bulky calcification within the landing zone may impact the ability for the thv leaflets to properly function.The bulky calcium can impinge on the thv leaflets, preventing them from proper coaptation and lead to regurgitation.In this case, the valve exhibits central regurgitation after valve deployment was unable to be confirmed.The available information suggests that patient factors (calcification) likely contributed to the complaint event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA RESILIA VALVE, 23MM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18608359
MDR Text Key334112062
Report Number2015691-2024-00659
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/30/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9755RSL23A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/06/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/22/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-