It was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a 20mm amplatzer amulet left atrial appendage occluder was implanted in a patient.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient presented to hospital with cardiac tamponade.The physician insinuated that the amulet device eroded through the pulmonary artery tissue, causing leak into the pericardial space.The patient was taken to surgery where a pericardial window was made, and the epicardium was drained.The amulet occluder remained implanted.The patient status was stable and recovering from a recent stroke.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a 20mm amplatzer amulet left atrial appendage (laa) occluder was implanted in a patient.Post procedure, the patient's anti-thrombotic regimen was dual antiplatelet therapy (dapt), which included aspirin and plavix, which was taken from (b)(6) 2022 to (b)(6) 2022.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient had a stroke.Per cardiologist, it was unable to be determined if the stroke was related to the performance of the implanted device.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient presented to hospital with cardiac tamponade.The physician insinuated that the amulet device eroded through the pulmonary artery tissue, causing leak into the pericardial space.The patient was taken to surgery where a pericardial window was made, and the epicardium was drained.300 ml of fluid and blood clot was removed from the pericardium, and a drain was placed.The surgeon stated that the pulmonary artery was intact.The effusion was a result of the amulet occluder slightly protruding through the wall of the laa.The amulet occluder remained implanted.Patient was scheduled to resume dapt with aspirin and plavix.The patient status was stable.
|
An event of stroke and cardiac tamponade was reported.A returned device assessment could not be performed as the device remains implanted and was not returned for analysis.However, imaging received from the field were reviewed and revealed that the part of the amulet device that was ¿slightly protruding through the wall of the laa¿ was likely the disc.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed, and the product met all specifications.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not conclusively be determined but may have been due to the orientation of the device.
|