It was reported that, during an internal fixation surgery, a 2.0mm unknown evos plating screw was inserted into a radius mid shaft fracture and upon inserting the screw on power to finish seating with hand tightening the head of the screw broke off approximately 2-3 mm from the head.The broken piece was removed, but the rest of the broken screw was left inside the patient.The procedure was completed using evos mini 2.4 mm screws, no delays to the surgery were reported due to this issue.No patient injury was reported due to this issue.
|
H3, h6: the provided photographs were reviewed, and revealed that the screws fractured.However, the devices sent by the costumer were returned and evaluated.Although the screws provided were not directly involved in the complaint case, similar screws in terms of size and specification were provided.A review made by the quality engineering team revealed that, upon investigation, it was discovered that all six parts provided by the sales representative were within the tolerance outlined in the drawing print.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided, the definitive clinical root cause of the reported breakage could not be determined.Although a procedure vs user error could not be rule out as a contributory factor.The evos screws are made of stainless steel, and they are used to fix the plate to the bone, inside the patient.According to the report, the body of the screw was left secured in the patient's bone, therefore, the possibility of micro-motion and/or migration is unlikely.The surgeon completed the procedure with a evos mini 2.4mm screw in a new bone hole without any injury to the patient, however, it is unclear if there was a delay in the procedure.The impact to the patient was the retained screw.Should any additional relevant medical information be provided, this case would be re-assessed.A review of the instructions for use documents for evos plating system revealed that loosening, bending, cracking or fracture of implant components has been identified in the adverse effects.The devices' specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, risk management files, prior actions and product prints review could not be performed.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|