Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information: h6 component code: g07002 device not returned.Additional information has been requested and received.Attempts to obtain the device have been made.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The fragment remained temporarily in the body.The fragment was retrieved without additional incision.The patient has been in good condition since the procedure.What is the lot number? unk.Was leakage detected? unk.Did the drain break into two or more pieces? yes, two.Please clarify what is meant by "broken part was removed from the patient¿s body" it was retrieved from the body.Did a piece of drain fall into the patient's body? yes.It was broken inside the patient's body.Was the patient taken back to the operating room to remove the broken drain surgically? no.It was retrieved from the body in the same surgeon.Please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.We regularly contact with sales rep about the device returning.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).H3 evaluation: one complaint sample of flat drain (in two parts) was received for evaluation, during visual inspection it was observed that, both the parts were separated from hub area, and there were visible cut marks on the separation surfaces of both the parts.Documents review : batch manufacturing record review is not performed, as the lot no of complaint is unknown.Retention sample review : retention sample is not checked, as the lot no of complaint is unknown.It is suspected that, hub area of the drain might have come in contact with some sharp tool used prior / during surgery, and lead to the defect generation.External factors like mishandling or improper usage at user end could not be ruled out.Therefore, further investigation of the received samples is not possible.As per standard practice, 100% functional test was performed on the product.Also, 100% visual inspection was carried out, visually before and after packing of finished goods, prior to the product release.So, there was no scope to miss defect, at manufacturing / release stage.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|