Catalog Number ME2020 |
Device Problems
Backflow (1064); Defective Component (2292)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/06/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that bd maxguard extension set was damaged the following information was received by the initial reporter with the following verbatim: the end of the tubing that connects to the patient/mivf tubing (white cap end) broke off while connected to patient, leaving the clear luer lock part in the iv hub and allowing blood to back flow back into the mivf tubing.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
E1: initial reporter facility name- (b)(6) hospital.H.3.If a device evaluation and/or device history review is completed, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information was provided.Material#: mme2020, batch number#: 23079080.It was reported by customer that the end of the tubing that connects to the patient/mivf tubing (white cap end) broke off while connected to patient, leaving the clear luer lock part in the iv hub and allowing blood to back flow back into the mivf tubing.Verbatim#: rcc received a complaint via email.Email(s) attached.The end of the tubing that connects to the patient/mivf tubing (white cap end) broke off while connected to patient, leaving the clear luer lock part in the iv hub and allowing blood to back flow back into the mivf tubing.Product#: mme2020.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported by customer that the end of the tubing that connects to the patient/mivf tubing (white cap end) broke off while connected to patient, one sample of me2020 was submitted for quality evaluation.Visual examination of the sample submitted shows that the tubing is missing the male luer connector from the extension set.Further examination of the distal end of the tubing shows that there is a lack of solvent at the distal end tubing.The lack of solvent may have contributed to the luer connector separating from the tubing.The customer complaint of separation was confirmed.An additional investigation was then conducted at the manufacturing facility.The investigation at the manufacturing facility indicates that the possible root cause for the issue seen in the complaint is an incorrect method of solvent application (excessive solvent) by the assembler.A quality alert was issued to reinforce the correct solvent application method to avoid the excessive solvent issue in future production.A device history record review for model me2020 lot number 23079080 was performed.The search showed that a total of (b)(4) units in 1 lot number was built on 12jul2023.There were no quality notifications issued for the failure mode reported by the customer during the production build of this set.This incident has been added to our database of reported incidents.Our business team regularly reviews the collected data for identification of emerging trends.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|