• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER AMULET; CARDIAC PLUG

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER AMULET; CARDIAC PLUG Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 9-ACP2-010-028
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Date 01/16/2024
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on 16 january 2024, a 28mm amplatzer amulet left atrial appendage occluder was chosen for a left atrial appendage occlusion (laao) procedure using a 14f amplatzer amulet delivery sheath.The patient had a challenging anatomy with a landing zone of 27.2 x 17.2 mm on computed tomography (ct) and the shape of the appendage was broccoli.For device selection, the team used ct, transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) and fluoroscopy imaging.During procedure, after some tries and different possible device position, the physician decided to release the device.The physician confirmed the close criteria was fulfilled and tension test was performed, and the device was delivered and the device compression was in the flat tire shape.Some minutes after the delivery, tee showed the device was moving and the physician decided to recapture the amulet via a non-abbott catheter, but the device embolized.The amulet went from the auricle to the ventricle.There was partial obstruction of blood flow between auricula and ventricle.The physician believes the cause of embolization was device failure and/or sizing and anatomy.After hours of trying to recapture the device with the amulet delivery sheath, non-abbott catheters, snares, and wires, the attempts were unsuccessful, so the patient went to open-heart surgery.The retrieval of the embolized device was considered an emergency procedure.The device was extracted, but the mitral valve was damaged.The surgeon replaced the mitral valve.On (b)(6) 2024, 10 hours after the surgery, the patient passed away.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event of device embolization from the auricle to the ventricle, partial obstruction of blood flow between auricula and ventricle and patient death was reported.It was reported that the patient had a challenging anatomy and the shape of the appendage was broccoli.It was confirmed that the close criteria was fulfilled and tension test was performed, and the device was delivered in flat tire shape compression after attempts and different possible device positions during procedure.Information from field indicated that after hours of trying to recapture the device the attempts were unsuccessful, the patient went to open-heart surgery.The device was extracted, but the mitral valve was damaged.It was reported that the mitral valve was replaced and the patient expired ten hours after the surgery.A returned device assessment could not be performed as the device was not returned for analysis.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to labeling design or manufacturing of the device.The provided imaging from field showed that the proposed landing zone had 9.6 mm of depth in the 136-degree tee view, less than the 12 mm required for the 28 mm device attempted.Please note that per the instructions for use, "identify and measure the left atrial appendage at the landing zone (defined as about 10 mm-12 mm from the orifice) for the device lobe (shown as v in table t2) to determine the appropriate device size to occlude the left atrial appendage.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMPLATZER AMULET
Type of Device
CARDIAC PLUG
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL #3014918977
edificio #44 calle 0, ave. 2
el coyol alajuela 1897- 4050
CS   1897-4050
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key18655377
MDR Text Key334705403
Report Number2135147-2024-00546
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NGV
UDI-Device Identifier00811806013503
UDI-Public(01)00811806013503(17)270831(10)8677719
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMX
PMA/PMN Number
P200049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number9-ACP2-010-028
Device Lot Number8677719
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/16/2024
Initial Date FDA Received02/06/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/26/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/03/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured09/23/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-