• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problem Visual Prompts will not Clear (2281)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint that the autopulse platform (sn (b)(6)) displayed user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) was confirmed during both archive data review and functional testing.The root cause of the ua07 was the failed load cell #1.The broken covers and load cell failure were likely attributed to mishandling, such as a drop.Visual inspection showed that the front enclosure, top cover, load plate cover, and bottom enclosure were all damaged, unrelated to the reported complaint.Based on the photos provided by the zoll service team, all the covers had multiple cracks and were chipped/broken at various locations.Also, the load plate cover was damaged with cuts, affecting the watertight seal.These observed physical damages appeared as characteristic of harsh impacts due to user mishandling.All the damaged parts will be replaced to address the observed issues.A review of the archive data showed multiple user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) around the customer's reported complaint date, confirming the reported complaint.Functional testing failed due to the ua07 advisory message displayed upon powering up the platform, confirming the reported complaint.A load cell characterization test confirmed that the root cause of the ua07 was the failed load cell #1, which was replaced.Subsequently, the autopulse platform passed a functional test using lrtf (large resuscitation test fixture) with known-good batteries for 5 minutes with no problem.Further inspection revealed that the clutch plate was sticky, unrelated to the reported complaint.This is usually caused by sharp edges of the armature plate, or due to burrs on the surface of the clutch rotor.The impact of the sticky clutch was not severe enough to make the platform non-functional.The clutch plate will be deburred to remedy the problem.Upon service completion, the platform will be subjected to final functional testing to ensure the device will pass all testing criteria.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint, and there were no similar complaints reported for the autopulse platform with serial number (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The autopulse platform (sn (b)(6)) was attempted to be used to resuscitate a patient in cardiac arrest.However, upon powering up, the autopulse platform displayed user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large).The customer was unable to clear the ua07 advisory.The patient's status information was requested, but the customer did not provide a response.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
kim thoa nguyen
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose, CA 95131
4084192922
MDR Report Key18665073
MDR Text Key334844538
Report Number3010617000-2024-00122
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/07/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0730-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/30/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/30/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-