• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGTRSB60AXT
Device Problems Misfire (2532); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/26/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant product: sigphandle - sig power sigphandle handle, serial#: (b)(6) sigtrsb60amt - sigtrsb60amt 60mm med thk reinforced rel, lot# unknown.H3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the reload pushers were fired, however, the sled was not fully advanced.The jaws were open and the distal suture on the anvil side was still anchored on reinforcement material.The distal cartridge suture was not present.It was reported that the retention suture at distal end of the reload did not get cut by the knife blade during the firing process.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy procedure, at the time of the initial transection of stomach at the antrum, the retention suture at distal end of the reload did not get cut by the knife blade during the firing process.The surgeon used excess force to remove the buttress from jaw of reload.There was no patient injury.Pli10: medtronic's initial evaluation of the incident device found the reload pushers were fired, however, the sled was not fully advanced.Pli 30: the devices were returned without accompanying information.Pli 20: medtronic's initial evaluation of the incident device found the system terminated firing at the determined endstop zone as intended by the software but prior to the distal suture being released.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Type of Device
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key18673135
MDR Text Key336056007
Report Number1219930-2024-00641
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173270
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIGTRSB60AXT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGTRSB60AXT
Device Lot NumberN2J0032Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/05/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/19/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10.
Patient SexFemale
-
-