• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number ONYXNG20015X
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/23/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug-eluting stent to treat a lesion.It was reported that stent dislodgement occurred during delivery to/at the lesion.The dislodged stent was removed. no patient injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the lesion had severely diffuse disease in the dominant distal left circumflex (cx).After the large obtuse marginal om2 branch, there was a severe disease in cx, and more distally there was severe diffuse disease.There was mild 40% stenosis in the proximal cx.The patient had positive troponin levels with chest pains.There was no damage noted to the packaging.There was no issue noted when removing the device from hoop.The device was inspected before use and this is when the stent was noted to be missing during prep.The lesion was pre-dilated, but the stent was never inserted into the vessel.It was later reported that the stent was never inserted into the patient's vessel.The stent was never implanted.The stent delivery catheter was not inserted into the patient after the stent had dislodged in vitro.The patient is alive.Patients age and sex.Event date.Product analysis: the stent delivery catheter returned in an open pouch within an open shelf carton in a biohazard bag.The stent did not return a kink was evident on the hypotube.The stent was not present on the balloon and did not return for analysis.The balloon folds remained intact.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.The inner lumen patency was verified with a 0.015 inch mandrel.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: annex d code.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ONYX FRONTIER
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18694519
MDR Text Key335244450
Report Number9612164-2024-00751
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P160043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberONYXNG20015X
Device Catalogue NumberONYXNG20015X
Device Lot Number0011997620
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received02/13/2024
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/13/2024
03/11/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/06/2024
03/19/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age49 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-