Catalog Number MS18853 |
Device Problem
Image Display Error/Artifact (1304)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/11/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The customer reported that on (b)(6) 2023, the patient required the use of the cardiac monitor to monitor the vital signs during surgery.It was noted that there was no abnormality observed during the use, but the operator found that the ecg leads could not be displayed normally as there was interference.The use of the kappa monitor was immediately stopped and replaced by another one.There is no report of patient harm or adverse event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation has just started; results will be provided in a follow-up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer reported that on (b)(6) 2023, the patient required the use of the cardiac monitor to monitor the vital signs during surgery.It was noted that there was no abnormality observed during the use, but the operator found that the ecg leads could not be displayed normally as there was interference.The use of the kappa monitor was immediately stopped and replaced by another one.There is no report of patient harm or adverse event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As per report, the device was used for monitoring during a surgical procedure and was initially working without restrictions until interference on the ecg trace has occurred.Reportedly, the disturbance could be eliminated by replacing the monitor and ecg cable; the hospital could later draw a causal connection between the observations and the ecg cable.It was confirmed by the hospital that the surgical procedure could be continued with no delay and that there was no negative influence that affected the patient.The user facility did not involve the local dräger s&s organization into any follow-up measures and did not respond to requests for further information.The suspected ecg lead wires were also not returned.This does neither allow a case-specific evaluation nor a reliable conclusion about the exact root cause for the event.Dräger concludes the following: the source of interference must have been another product among the set-up used during the surgery.Based on experience, such interference may occur when an electrosurgical device will be activated.It would be plausible that the immunity barriers of the monitor against electromagnetic interference may have been compromised due to a defective shielding at the ecg cable.The event may also have been related to other factors; a differentiation is not possible due to lack of information.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|